Deregulating Relevancy

(August 2003)

Eric Goldman

Marquette University Law School

eric.goldman@marquette.edu

http://eric_goldman.tripod.com

 

 

Introductory Words About TMs

w   TMs are product source identifiers

w   Goals of TM law:

n    Reduce consumer search costs

n    Protect producers’ investment in goodwill

w   Infringement standard: “likelihood of consumer confusion” about product source

n    Usually determined by a multi-factor test

n    But when consumers aren’t confused at purchase, courts may evaluate goodwill misappropriation

 

Defining Misappropriation

w   My Goal: Determine when junior users have appropriated too much benefit in situations where consumers aren’t confused at purchase

w   This requires us to separate “association” from “misappropriation”

n    Association = calling attention to content using a keyword/TM

n    Misappropriation = transference to the junior user of good feelings about TM owner

w   TM doctrines like Initial Interest Confusion and Sponsorship Confusion conflate the two

 

What About Relevancy?

w   When association = misappropriation, relevant content can infringe

n    Non-TM uses

n    Comparative information

n    Commentary/criticism/parody

n    After-market providers

w   This may increase net social search costs

n    TM owner can veto socially beneficial content

n    Some searches must use alternative search terms

 

Misappropriation from Search Diversion

w   Searchers dynamically assess the cost/benefit of incremental search steps

n    A searcher who has been diverted decides whether to switch or continue

w   In diversion cases, TM misappropriation should occur only when a junior user distorts decision-making because users’ switching costs exceed expected benefits from switch

n    Analogous to bait ‘n’ switch

n    Adjusts with strength of goodwill

n    Creates space for relevant alternative content

 

Interesting Attributes of Internet Searches

w   Internet searches can lower search costs

n    Availability of filtering content

n    Low extrication costs

n    Comprehensive searches

w   We cannot infer search objectives merely based on a keyword

n    Searches often lack surrounding context

n    Searchers have heterogeneous search objectives

n    Searchers often choose keywords poorly

 

Preserving Relevancy

w   Eliminate pre-sale goodwill misappropriation except for switching cost arbitrage

w   Use false advertising when appropriate

w   Expect search providers to optimize relevancy

n    Marketer abuses will be curbed by technology and evolved searcher expectations/practices

n    Search providers need a legal safe harbor for advanced relevancy techniques